Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
GooglePlus
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Yelp
(0) Items in Cart $0.00
View Cart
Your shopping cart is currently empty.

DV8 Ruckus Feud Bowling Ball

Our Price: $149.95 

Select Your Options:

Weight?

Pin Position?

Top Weight?

Surface Adjustment?

CLOSEX
Quantity:
Our Price: $149.95 
DV8 Ruckus Feud Bowling Ball - WWRD 1/23/14


DV8 Ruckus Feud Bowling Ball - WWRD 1/23/14

All colors vary somewhat from the picture shown.

DV8 Ruckus Feud


  • Color: Black/Red/Yellow
  • Coverstock: Class 12 Solid Reactive
  • Weight Block: Ruckus Medium RG
  • Factory Finish: 500, 1,500 Siaair Micro Pad
  • Flare Potential: High
  • Radius of Gyration (RG): 2.540
  • Differential (Diff): .052
  • Intermediate Differential (Mass Bias): 0.013
  • Fragrance: n/a
  • Description:

    Ball Motion:
    Featuring the new Class 12 Solid Reactive coverstock wrapped around the Ruckus core, the Ruckus Feud tractions in the oil and revs hard on the backend for the most total hook potential of any DV8 ever on heavy oil lane conditions.
  • Product Rating: (5.00)   # of Ratings: 2   Rate It! Click Here to rate this product


    1 - Terrible
    2 - Bad
    3 - OK
    4 - Good
    5 - Great
    0% 50% 100%

    Sort: New to Old RE-SORT COMMENTS:

    Showing comments 1-2 of 2
    1. Anonymous User on 4/2/2014, said:

    I have not purchased this ball yet but I did see it in action. My friend Brandon is a high rev player and he had this ball drilled so it wouldn't hook as much, and it just killed the pocket on every hit. Nothing was left on the pin deck. I can't remember the last time I saw a ball dominate like that. This ball isn't light or medium oil. One will be in my bag very soon.
    Was this comment helpful? yes no   (0 people found this comment helpful, 0 did not)
    2. Anonymous User on 2/7/2014, said:

    Really good ball. Made for the oil. Went right through the oil and hit hard in the back end. All I can say it's a Good Ball from DV8.
    Was this comment helpful? yes no   (0 people found this comment helpful, 1 did not)
    Showing comments 1-2 of 2